lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 13 Sep 2010 01:32:00 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"M. Vefa Bicakci" <bicave@...eronline.com>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] vmscan: check all_unreclaimable in direct reclaim path

Adnrew, Please drop my old version and merge this verstion.
(old : vmscan-check-all_unreclaimable-in-direct-reclaim-path.patch)
   
 * Changelog from v2 
   * remove inline - suggested by Andrew
   * add function desription - suggeseted by Adnrew

== CUT HERE == 

Subject: [PATCH v2] vmscan: check all_unreclaimable in direct reclaim path

M. Vefa Bicakci reported 2.6.35 kernel hang up when hibernation on his 
32bit 3GB mem machine. (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16771)
Also he was bisected first bad commit is below

  commit bb21c7ce18eff8e6e7877ca1d06c6db719376e3c
  Author: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
  Date:   Fri Jun 4 14:15:05 2010 -0700

     vmscan: fix do_try_to_free_pages() return value when priority==0 reclaim failure

At first impression, this seemed very strange because the above commit only
chenged function return value and hibernate_preallocate_memory() ignore
return value of shrink_all_memory(). But it's related.

Now, page allocation from hibernation code may enter infinite loop if
the system has highmem. The reasons are that vmscan don't care enough
OOM case when oom_killer_disabled.

The problem sequence is following as. 

1. hibernation
2. oom_disable
3. alloc_pages
4. do_try_to_free_pages
       if (scanning_global_lru(sc) && !all_unreclaimable)
               return 1;

If kswapd is not freezed, it would set zone->all_unreclaimable to 1 and then
shrink_zones maybe return true(ie, all_unreclaimable is true).
so at last, alloc_pages could go to _nopage_. If it is, it should have no problem.

This patch adds all_unreclaimable check to protect in direct reclaim path, too.
It can care of hibernation OOM case and help bailout all_unreclaimable case slightly.

Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@...eronline.com>
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |   46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 7870893..ecae0ef 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1877,12 +1877,11 @@ static void shrink_zone(int priority, struct zone *zone,
  * If a zone is deemed to be full of pinned pages then just give it a light
  * scan then give up on it.
  */
-static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
+static void shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
                                        struct scan_control *sc)
 {
        struct zoneref *z;
        struct zone *zone;
-       bool all_unreclaimable = true;

        for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
                                        gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
@@ -1900,8 +1899,41 @@ static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
                }

                shrink_zone(priority, zone, sc);
-               all_unreclaimable = false;
        }
+}
+
+static bool zone_reclaimable(struct zone *zone)
+{
+       return zone->pages_scanned < zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) * 6;
+}
+
+/*
+ * As hibernation is going on, kswapd is freezed so that it can't mark
+ * the zone into all_unreclaimable. It can't handle OOM during hibernation.
+ * So let's check zone's unreclaimable in direct reclaim as well as kswapd.
+ */
+static bool all_unreclaimable(struct zonelist *zonelist,
+               struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+       struct zoneref *z;
+       struct zone *zone;
+       bool all_unreclaimable = true;
+
+       if (!scanning_global_lru(sc))
+               return false;
+
+       for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
+                       gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
+               if (!populated_zone(zone))
+                       continue;
+               if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
+                       continue;
+               if (zone_reclaimable(zone)) {
+                       all_unreclaimable = false;
+                       break;
+               }
+       }
+
        return all_unreclaimable;
 }

@@ -1925,7 +1957,6 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
                                        struct scan_control *sc)
 {
        int priority;
-       bool all_unreclaimable;
        unsigned long total_scanned = 0;
        struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
        struct zoneref *z;
@@ -1942,7 +1973,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
                sc->nr_scanned = 0;
                if (!priority)
                        disable_swap_token();
-               all_unreclaimable = shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
+               shrink_zones(priority, zonelist, sc);
                /*
                 * Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
                 * over limit cgroups
@@ -2004,7 +2035,7 @@ out:
                return sc->nr_reclaimed;

        /* top priority shrink_zones still had more to do? don't OOM, then */
-       if (scanning_global_lru(sc) && !all_unreclaimable)
+       if (!all_unreclaimable(zonelist, sc))
                return 1;

        return 0;
@@ -2270,8 +2301,7 @@ loop_again:
                        total_scanned += sc.nr_scanned;
                        if (zone->all_unreclaimable)
                                continue;
-                       if (nr_slab == 0 &&
-                           zone->pages_scanned >= (zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) * 6))
+                       if (nr_slab == 0 && !zone_reclaimable(zone))
                                zone->all_unreclaimable = 1;
                        /*
                         * If we've done a decent amount of scanning and
-- 
1.7.0.5


-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ