[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100912221906.GA22029@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:19:06 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Fr?d?ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: disabling group leader perf_event
* Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> On Sun 2010-09-12 22:32:58, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > > On Sun 2010-09-12 20:48:43, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > > > > 1- Most (least abstract) specific code: a block of bytecode in the form
> > > > > > of a simplified, executable, kernel-checked x86 machine code block -
> > > > > > this is also the fastest form. [yes, this is actually possible.]
> > > > > >Well... if we want to be a bit x86-entric.... can we just reuse ACPI
> > > > > >interpretter?
> > > > >
> > > > > I hope this was a joke, ACPI won the academy awards for ugliness,
> > > > > ..., bad specification, non-generality, and
> > >
> > > As did i386 instruction set :-).
> >
> > Are you kidding? The i386 instruction set may be ugly, but it's
> > implemented in hardware, which has obvious upsides.
>
> I was partly joking. But you have to admit that i386 set is ugly and
> badly specified.
Fortunately since i already said that it's ugly, in the sentence you
quote above, i dont have to 'admit' it yet again, right? ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists