[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100912122955.GA28839@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 14:29:55 +0200
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...radead.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: Remove useless condition
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 04:32:20PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
>
> if (ret) is useless as it will be never NULL as in previous statement
> we are setting ret = prev for !ret
If there is no match and no extent below the given file offset, `prev'
will be NULL as well, no?
So the check is not useless, it prevents throwing out a cached success
in case of a lookup failure.
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>
> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> index e56c72b..7b04008 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> @@ -154,8 +154,7 @@ static inline struct rb_node *tree_search(struct btrfs_ordered_inode_tree *tree,
> ret = __tree_search(root, file_offset, &prev);
> if (!ret)
> ret = prev;
> - if (ret)
> - tree->last = ret;
> + tree->last = ret;
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.2.2
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists