[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100913101643.22a1e7d5@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:16:43 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED] workqueue: add documentation
one more detail, seems like this never ends... sorry :)
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:08:12 +0200
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> +
> +For an unbound wq, the above concurrency management doesn't apply and
> +the gcwq for the pseudo unbound CPU tries to start executing all work
> +items as soon as possible. The responsibility of regulating
> +concurrency level is on the users. There is also a flag to mark a
> +bound wq to ignore the concurrency management. Please refer to the
> +Workqueue Attributes section for details.
renamed to "API section"
regards,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists