[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100913092355.GA20954@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:23:55 +0200
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] writeback: remove the internal 5% low bound on
dirty_ratio
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:49:46PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> The dirty_ratio was siliently limited in global_dirty_limits() to >= 5%.
> This is not a user expected behavior. And it's inconsistent with
> calc_period_shift(), which uses the plain vm_dirty_ratio value.
>
> Let's rip the arbitrary internal bound. It may impact some very weird
> user space applications. However we are going to dynamicly sizing the
> dirty limits anyway, which may well break such applications, too.
>
> At the same time, fix balance_dirty_pages() to work with the
> dirty_thresh=0 case. This allows applications to proceed when
> dirty+writeback pages are all cleaned.
>
> And ">" fits with the name "exceeded" better than ">=" does. Neil
> think it is an aesthetic improvement as well as a functional one :)
>
> CC: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> Proposed-by: Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
> Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists