[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1284344389.3269.82.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:19:49 +0800
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/6] x86, NMI, Add support to notify hardware error with
unknown NMI
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 02:40 +0800, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 06:19:29PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > > I am grasping for straws here, but is there a register that APEI/HEST
> > > can poke to see if it generated the NMI?
> >
> > HEST knows this yes.
> >
> > But this is not about HEST errors, but about those without HEST
> > handling.
>
> Don't most unknown NMIs fall into the same boat, that they were not being
> handled properly?
As far as I know, at least on some platforms, unknown NMIs are used for
hardware error reporting. They will cause "Blue Screen" in Windows.
> On the other hand could you use the die_notifier_chain(DIE_UNKNOWNNMI) for
> the same purpose and keep the unknown_nmi_error() handler a little
> cleaner?
I think explicit function call has better readability than notifier
chain.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists