[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100913123745.e4a4df44.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:37:45 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in net/core/dev.c
between commit 05532121da0728eaedac2a0a5c3cecad3a95d765 ("net: 802.1q:
make vlan_hwaccel_do_receive() return void") from the net tree and commit
cf66ba58b5cb8b1526e9dd2fb96ff8db048d4d44 ("netdev: Add tracepoints to
netdev layer") from the tip tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc net/core/dev.c
index fc2dc93,2308cce..0000000
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@@ -2847,8 -2835,9 +2854,9 @@@ static int __netif_receive_skb(struct s
if (!netdev_tstamp_prequeue)
net_timestamp_check(skb);
+ trace_netif_receive_skb(skb);
- if (vlan_tx_tag_present(skb) && vlan_hwaccel_do_receive(skb))
- return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
+ if (vlan_tx_tag_present(skb))
+ vlan_hwaccel_do_receive(skb);
/* if we've gotten here through NAPI, check netpoll */
if (netpoll_receive_skb(skb))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists