[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100913120247.GJ16606@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:02:48 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: Add architecture dependency for Marvell SoC
controller
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:48:38PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I think we normally try to do the the other way round: in order to increase
> build coverage, try to enable all drivers on as many platforms as possible,
> just don't have them in the defconfig.
This is not the general pattern for on-CPU devices on the embedded SoCs,
for those we normally only offer the config option when building for a
system which could physically have the device. Looking at the existing
MMC host drivers you'll see this pattern is already heavily used there -
all the existing embedded controllers have similar dependencies.
> Do you get build errors on other platforms? If yes, there is probably
> a bug in the driver that should be fixed instead.
No, I didn't even try to build it - I saw that I was being offered a
device for a Marvell CPU when building for a non-Marvell CPU.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists