[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100913132618.GB2555@sortiz-mobl>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:26:19 +0200
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mattias Wallin <mattias.wallin@...ricsson.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
elinwal <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] MFD: AB8500 debugfs
Hi Mattias,
I have some addtional comments:
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:33:02AM +0200, Mattias Wallin wrote:
> +static struct platform_driver ab8500_debug_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "ab8500-debug",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + },
> + .probe = ab8500_debug_probe,
> + .remove = __devexit_p(ab8500_debug_remove)
> +};
> +
> +static int __init ab8500_debug_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&ab8500_debug_driver);
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit ab8500_debug_exit(void)
> +{
> + platform_driver_unregister(&ab8500_debug_driver);
> +}
It seems a bit awkward to me to have this code as an actual platform driver.
Why not defining ab8500_debug_[probe|remove] in ab8500.h as no-op when
CONFIG_AB8500_DEBUG is not defined and as extern otherwise ?
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists