[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1284392368.17152.44.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:39:28 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 1/2] sched: dynamically adapt granularity with
nr_running
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 11:25 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > > The more divs we put it, the more expensive it all becomes.
> > >
> >
> > What about:
> >
> > if (delta_exec < sysctl_sched_min_granularity ||
> > delta_exec < __sched_gran(cfs_rq->nr_running))
> >
> > This way we avoid the div when delta_exec is less than the
> > min_granularity, and then we can do the div to perhaps avoid a needless
> > resched?
>
> Please note that my patch does not even take the 32-bit div when there are less
> than 4 threads running on the system.
>
> So I'm not at all sure we're trying to optimize an important case here.
If we have 5 threads running and hit this where delta_exec is <
sched_min_granularity, then we do have that div, right? Question is, how
often do we hit this condition where delta_exec is less while running
more that 4 threads?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists