[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100913181959.GB20171@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:19:59 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] check_preempt_tick should not compare vruntime with
wall time
* Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
> 2.0GHz Pentium M
>
> * wakeup-latency.c (SIGEV_THREAD) with make -j10
>
> - Mainline 2.6.35.2 kernel
>
> maximum latency: 45762.1 µs
> average latency: 7348.6 µs
> missed timer events: 0
>
> - check_preempt fix
>
> maximum latency: 39858.9 µs
> average latency: 7728.1 µs
> missed timer events: 0
Note that the check_preempt fix, as i mentioned it in the previous mail,
has no effect on this workload - so any effect you see is pure noise.
> - With only Peter's smaller min_gran (shown below):
>
> maximum latency: 29100.6 µs
> average latency: 6684.1 µs
> missed timer events: 0
That's the real improvement.
> - check_preempt fix + Peter's smaller min_gran:
> maximum latency: 20433.0 µs
> average latency: 5112.5 µs
> missed timer events: 0
Again, pure noise effect.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists