[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100913193655.GF26290@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:36:55 -0400
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/6] x86, NMI, Add support to notify hardware error with
unknown NMI
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 08:36:54PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > >
> > > But if it's generic if not on the screen it should
> > > be at least in the error serialization data and logged after boot.
> >
> > I guess I don't know what that is, 'error serialization data'. Is
> > there somewhere I can read more about it?
>
> That's already supported in MCE -- saving the error record to NVRAM
> and logging it after reboot. NMI should probably do the same.
> It's much nicer than getting it from a console.
Hmm, that assumes these boxes have NVRAM. I am not sure if many of the
boxes I see with problems have NVRAM on them.
>
> > >
> > > At least on PCI-E it may be enough to simply dump all recent AER
> > > data.
> >
> > This assumes AER is supported on the bridge? Which for newer chips is
> > probably true, but I wasn't sure about older ones.
>
> Today's servers should usually have AER at least.
>
> For old systems you only can get the few bits in PCI space.
>
> > How would I dump AER data from within the kernel?
>
> Would need a buffer that is dumped for past events and
> reading the registers for not yet reported. Right now some
> infrastructure is needed.
Oh ok.
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists