linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/25] drivers/i2c: Use static const char arrays

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C8E84A0.1010606@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk>
Date:	Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:08:00 +0100
From:	Jonathan Cameron <arm@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Jean Delvare \(PC drivers, core\)" <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	"Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/25] drivers/i2c: Use static const char arrays

 Commit message is  somewhat inaccurate...

On 09/13/10 20:47, Joe Perches wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stu300.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stu300.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stu300.c
> index 495be45..2f7c09c 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stu300.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stu300.c
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ stu300_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct resource *res;
>  	int bus_nr;
>  	int ret = 0;
> -	char clk_name[] = "I2C0";
> +	char clk_name[sizeof("I2Cx")];
>  
>  	dev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct stu300_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!dev) {
> @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ stu300_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	}
>  
>  	bus_nr = pdev->id;
> -	clk_name[3] += (char)bus_nr;
> +	sprintf(clk_name, "I2C%c", '0' + bus_nr);
I'm guessing that there are never more than a couple of these.
Why is this method a better bet than just putting %d?
>  	dev->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, clk_name);
>  	if (IS_ERR(dev->clk)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(dev->clk);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/