linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] lio-target: Add support for libcrypto crc32c and crc32-intel offload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1284416455.8171.89.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
Date:	Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:20:55 -0700
From:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To:	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
Cc:	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
	Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@...il.com>,
	Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...ux.intel.com>,
	Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] lio-target: Add support for libcrypto crc32c and
	crc32-intel offload

On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:40 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 15:35 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> > On 09/13/2010 02:50 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > >> IE the in-kernel crc32c routines apparently weren't able to
> > >> calculate the checksum in an endianness-independent manner.
> > >> So a CRC calculated on a BE machine would fail to be validated by a
> > >> LE machine and vice versa.
> > >>
> > >> Has this been fixed / verified?
> > >>
> > >
> > >> From taking a look at crypto/crc32c.c it still appears AFAICT to not be
> > > big endian safe.  I was planning to test this patch on some powerpc/ppc
> > > hardware with v2.6.36-rc4 in the next days, but it looks like
> > > lio-core-2.6.git will need a seperate crypto/crc32c.c patch to function
> > > properly on big endian arches.
> > >
> > 
> > There was this bug that was fixed a couple years ago:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=ef19454bd437b2ba14c9cda1de85debd9f383484
> > since then I think we have not had problems.
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> Thanks for the pointer on this, I will give it a shot on powerpc and see
> what happens.
> 
> FYI, I was under the assumption that for BIG_ENDIAN that crc32c() still
> needed an bitshift for the returned value.  This is what we had been
> doing with our old internal do_crc() code here:
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nab/lio-core-2.6.git;a=blob;f=drivers/target/lio-target/iscsi_crc.c;hb=83559072b27eb8cd92abb9a3fc9be85018c5db06#l138
> 
> AFAICT there is still nothing that makes crypto/crc32c.c big endian
> safe, unless I am overlooking something obvious..?
> 

Hi Mike and Hannes,

So after a quick test using Open-iSCSI 32-bit x86 VM w/ v2.6.27 and
LIO-Target 64-bit powerpc w/v2.6.36-rc3 with this libcrypto patch I do
not see any HeaderDigest or DataDigest failures using the exiting
slicing by 1x crypto/crc32c.c code on 64-bit BIG_ENDIAN.  While I am at
it I will also try OpenSuse 11.2 and RHEL6 B2 x86_64 VMs for good
measure.

So the appropiate endian conversion does occur in chksum_final() and
__chksum_finup() code.  My apologies for the earier confusion.

Thanks again,

--nab


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/