[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100913160905.332ff633.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:09:05 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Cong Meng <mcpacino@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: calculate block-size correctly
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 18:07:10 +0800
Cong Meng <mcpacino@...il.com> wrote:
> I sent this patch half mount ago, but no response at all. If anything is
> wrong, please tell me. Thanks a lots. This is my first time to send patch
> to linux kernel.
>
> The invocation of __getblk(bdev, block, size) will cause kernel stall if
> the @size parameter is not equal to the blockr-size of @bdev, which is saved
> in bdev->bd_inode->i_blkbits.
>
> submit_bh() has the similar problem.
>
> This patch calculates the block-size using i_blkbits.
> So that, for example, __getblk() can get a 4K buffer head while the
> block-size of @bdev is 1K.
>
This comes up every couple of years and iirc we always decided that
it's a bug in the calling code somewhere. How did you hit it?
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@ -1051,10 +1051,7 @@ grow_buffers(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t block, int size)
> pgoff_t index;
> int sizebits;
>
> - sizebits = -1;
> - do {
> - sizebits++;
> - } while ((size << sizebits) < PAGE_SIZE);
I'm sure the existing code could use __roundup_pow_of_two() here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists