linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/20] mm: Preemptibility -v4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:42:48 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	"Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re:  [PATCH 00/20] mm: Preemptibility -v4

On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 13:36 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote:
> Peter:
> We tested your tree base on 2.6.36-rc3 kernel. The testing covered on
> Core2 2P, NHM-EP/WSM-EP machines, no clear performance regression found
> on your patch compare to 36-rc3, and also no clear improvements on our
> benchmarks. 
> 
> The benchmarks are listed in the following website, and plus some of
> FFSB/FIO scenarios.  http://kernel-perf.sourceforge.net/ 

Thanks, much appreciated!!

Hopefully we'll get sparc64 fixed up soon and can talk about merging
this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/