[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTim+7Q79hVv+r1PO2LeiiSCxb12CaqO3YuR8taL9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:47:42 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Dietrich <qy03fugy@...d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 03:21, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com> wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the m68knommu tree got a conflict in
>> arch/m68k/sun3/sun3ints.c between commit
>> 72fe185cd9acbfc6e8a7afa884ae1152be706e52 ("m68k/m68knommu: Remove dead
>> SMP config option") from the m68k tree and commit
>> 5313b581e4efc214c6132d32f580db6668e5c5a8 ("arch/m68k{,nommu}: Removing
>> dead SMP config option") from the m68knommu tree.
>>
>> These appear to be the same patch with some formatting differences. I
>> used the version from the m68k tree.
>
> Looks like Geert added the same patch to the m68k git tree.
> I'll drop it from the m68knommu git tree.
Sorry, I should have checked explicitly which patches were already in
the m68knommu git tree.
I did leave out one patch I knew (from email) Greg was going to take.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists