[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1009141207310.2416@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:09:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
cc: Artur Skawina <art.08.09@...il.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>,
John Drescher <drescherjm@...il.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [BISECTED] 2.6.35.*: horrible (exponential? >linear) slowdown
to unusability (HPET)
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Nix wrote:
> >
> > I suspect current_clocksource doesn't do what we think it does, or the
> > clocksource and 'clock event device' are not the same.)
>
> Right, they are not the same. clocksource provides us a read out
> device for timekeeping (usually a simple increasing counter). clock
> event device is used to generate timer interrupts.
>
> HPET provides both functionalities.
>
> The patch you bisected is affecting the clock events part of the
> HPET. So yes, it's not a clock source problem.
Another question. If you add hpet=verbose (or revert that commit) does
the printk_once in hpet_set_next_event() show up in dmesg ?
"hpet: compare register read back failed."
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists