[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201009141730.38215.oneukum@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:30:38 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>,
pingc@...om.com, "linux-pm" <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] wacom + runtime PM = AA deadlock
Am Dienstag, 14. September 2010, 17:23:15 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > > > Should I have used usb_autopm_get_interface_no_resume()?
> > >
> > > That actually would work. It's a good idea. The only drawback (not a
> > > big one) is that if the device _was_ suspended with remote wakeup
> > > enabled, doing this wouldn't turn off remote wakeup. I think that
> > > doesn't matter.
> >
> > I am afraid it does matter as devices whose remote wakeup is enabled
> > may draw more power.
>
> I doubt it, or at least, not very much more. They are still limited by
> the USB spec as to the total amount of current they can draw while
> suspended.
7.2.3 Sources of remote wakeup may draw 2.5mA when suspended
as opposed to 0.5 mA
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists