[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100914151219.5d92c6f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:12:19 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Thomas Moll <thomas.moll@...go.com>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
Micha Nelissen <micha@...i.hopto.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] RapidIO: Use stored ingress port number
instead of register read
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 10:59:16 -0400
Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@....com> wrote:
> @@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ struct rio_net {
> /**
> * struct rio_switch - RIO switch info
> * @node: Node in global list of switches
> + * @rdev: Associated RIO device structure
> * @switchid: Switch ID that is unique across a network
> * @hopcount: Hopcount to this switch
> * @destid: Associated destid in the path
> @@ -234,6 +235,7 @@ struct rio_net {
> */
> struct rio_switch {
> struct list_head node;
> + struct rio_dev *rdev;
> u16 switchid;
> u16 hopcount;
> u16 destid;
What is the locking for rdev? In other patches I see pointer chases
with no obvious locking against concurrent changes?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists