[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C8FF5DB.8000207@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:23:23 +0200
From: Artur Skawina <art.08.09@...il.com>
To: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>,
John Drescher <drescherjm@...il.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [BISECTED] 2.6.35.*: horrible (exponential? >linear) slowdown
to unusability (HPET)
> On 14 Sep 2010, Thomas Gleixner said:
>> Another question. If you add hpet=verbose (or revert that commit) does
>> the printk_once in hpet_set_next_event() show up in dmesg ?
>>
>> "hpet: compare register read back failed."
Since adding back that extra read, the box here, which previously
was showing the symptoms every couple of days, has been ok; so i'm
now ~80% sure this change was indeed the cause. Nothing new in logs.
$ dmesg | grep -i hpet
ACPI: HPET 00000000bfee5dc0 00038 (v01 GBT GBTUACPI 42302E31 GBTU 00000098)
ACPI: HPET id: 0x8086a201 base: 0xfed00000
hpet clockevent registered
HPET: 4 timers in total, 0 timers will be used for per-cpu timer
hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 0, 0
hpet0: 4 comparators, 64-bit 14.318180 MHz counter
rtc0: alarms up to one month, 242 bytes nvram, hpet irqs
$
artur
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists