linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100914143159.dca830f0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:31:59 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree
 (driver-core tree related)

Hi Thomas,

On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:26:13 +0200 Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On Monday 13 September 2010 17:51:55 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 19:34:04 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:54:26AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > > allnoconfig) produced this warning:
> > > > 
> > > > kernel/params.c: In function 'parse_args':
> > > > kernel/params.c:233: warning: the frame size of 1032 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
> > > > 
> > > > Introduced by commit 32e6407e9361cd1aac39ff6b744cad48d1802a08 ("Dynamic
> > > > Debug: Introduce global fake module param module.ddebug") which added a
> > > > 1024 byte array to the stack ...
> > > 
> > > Wierd, why didn't this show up yesterday?  The patch was in that tree
> > > then, right?
> > > 
> > > Thomas, care to fix this up?
> >  
> > ping.  Is Thomas around??
> Yep, sorry for not responding.
> 
> I tried to reproduce this on ppc64, but above file compiled without
> warning with dynamic debug set. Thus I thought this still came from the
> old patch.

The report is for a powerpc allnoconfig build (see above) i.e. ppc32.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped