linux-kernel - Re: Buffer allocation question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:52:56 +0200
From:	Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
To:	Ian Molton <ian.molton@...labora.co.uk>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Buffer allocation question

Ian Molton wrote:
> I need to allocate some fairly large buffers which will be transferred 
> via virtio to a hypervisor.
> 
> the pages dont have to be contiguous physically and aside from the first 
> page int he transfer, the kernel wont really care about the contents of 
> the buffer.
> 
> the pages do need to be mapped into userspace contiguously, however. 

See drivers/firewire/core-iso.c, which uses fixed-size buffers.

> They are also often dynamically resized.
> ...
> my first thought (before realising how limited vmalloc space is) was to 
> vmalloc() them in my mmap() function, but this approach ran into trouble 
> when I discovered that the mmap() call does not get called if the vma 
> grows, so I cant then hook in and allocate more vmalloc() space.

You can set vma->vm_ops.

> the buffers will usually be filled all in one go, so it seems silly to 
> fault them in a page at a time.

AFAICS you don't have a choice when resizing.


Regards,
Clemens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/