linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND/PATCH 5/6] USB: musb-gadget: complete request only if data is transfered over

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:41:39 +0400
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
To:	balbi@...com
CC:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
	"greg@...ah.com" <greg@...ah.com>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	"Gadiyar, Anand" <gadiyar@...com>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND/PATCH 5/6] USB: musb-gadget: complete request only if
 data is transfered over

Hello.

On 15-09-2010 14:31, Felipe Balbi wrote:

>> IMHO, this fix as it is now is quite stupid. It's clear that the check is
>> misplaced and will be removed once the ZLP fix is done. So why not do it once

> your forgetting the fact that not always you need to send ZLP after
> completing a packet_size-aligned transfer,

    So what?

> so that check will have to stay where it is.

    I don't see how these two are connected at all.

 >> and for all? Is it so hard to do? FWIW, I NAK this patch as it is now.

 > ok, but I don't.

    Well, you're the maintainer.

WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/