linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] ia64: possible module unwind table optimisation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100915124831.GB27658@esdhcp04044.research.nokia.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:48:31 +0300
From:	Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com>
To:	ext Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:	"fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ia64: possible module unwind table optimisation

On 15/09/10 01:18 +0200, ext Tony Luck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Phil Carmody
> <ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com> wrote:
> > Alas I have no way to test this patch.
> 
> Phil,
> 
> I have this built and booted on an ia64 ... what do you want me to measure? The
> number of iterations in:
> 
>   for (table = unw.tables; table; table = table->next)
> 
> before we find the right table to look?

Yes, that's the one. Sorry I wasn't more explicit.

Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/