[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1284562354.2573.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 07:52:34 -0700
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
"Xin, Xiaohui" <xiaohui.xin@...el.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] macvtap: TX zero copy between guest and host
kernel
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 12:10 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Another issue is that macvtap can be bound to almost
> anything, including e.g. a tap device or a bridge,
> which might hang on to skb fragments for unlimited time.
> Zero copy TX won't easily work there.
> I can imagine either somehow triggering a data copy after the
> fact (hard), or detecting such devices and avoiding
> zero copy (unfortunate for guest to guest, and drivers
> will need tuning).
So far macvtap zero copy patch is limited to lower devices supports high
memory DMA, it doesn't apply to a tap device or a bridge.
> > Don't you think once I address vhost_add_used_and_signal update
> > issue, it is a simple and complete patch for macvtap TX zero copy?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Shirley
>
> I like the fact that the patch is simple. Unfortunately
> I suspect it'll stop being simple by the time it's complete :)
I can make a try. :)
Thanks
Shirley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists