[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100915174157.GA22371@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:11:58 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther@...e.de>
Cc: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Matz <matz@...ell.com>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] After swapout/swapin private dirty mappings are
reported clean in smaps
* Richard Guenther <rguenther@...e.de> [2010-09-15 16:14:17]:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
> > * Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de> [2010-09-15 12:01:11]:
> >
> > > How? Current smaps information without this patch provides incorrect
> > > information. Just because a private dirty page became part of swap cache, it
> > > shown as clean and backed by a file. If it is shown as clean and backed by
> > > swap then it is fine.
> > >
> >
> > How is GDB using this information?
>
> GDB counts the number of dirty and swapped pages in a private mapping and
> based on that decides whether it needs to dump it to a core file or not.
> If there are no dirty or swapped pages gdb assumes it can reconstruct
> the mapping from the original backing file. This way for example
> shared libraries do not end up in the core file.
>
Thanks for clarifying
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists