[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C911002.8060807@web.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:27:14 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
CC: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KVM timekeeping 10/35] Fix deep C-state TSC desynchronization
Am 15.09.2010 14:32, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:09:33AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> In any case, I'll proceed with the forcing of unstable TSC and HPET
>>> clocksource and see what happens.
>>
>> I tried that before, but it did not trigger the issue that kvm-clock
>> guests no longer boot properly. This only happens if the TSC is marked
>> unstable.
>
> even artificially marked unstable ?
>
Yes. As soon as I hack tsc_unstable to 1, things go wrong. When I hack
it back to 0, guest that wants kvm-clock boots again and seem to run fine.
This is issue #2, I guess. Issue #2 remains that the TSC is marked
unstable. I have the feeling that this is bogus, maybe due to lacking
suspend/resume awareness? The tsc clocksource does
clocksource_tsc.cycle_last = 0;
on resume...
Jan
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (260 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists