[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m17him4ror.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:34:12 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
lnxninja@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] update /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches documentation
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 11:37 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > I'm worried that there are users out there experiencing real problems
>> > that aren't reporting it because "workarounds" like this just paper over
>> > the issue.
>>
>> For what it is worth. I had a friend ask me about a system that had 50%
>> of it's memory consumed by slab caches. 20GB out of 40GB. The kernel
>> was suse? 2.6.27 so it's old, but if you are curious.
>> /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches does nothing in that case.
>
> Was it the reclaimable caches doing it, though? The other really common
> cause is kmalloc() leaks.
It was reclaimable caches. He kept seeing the cache sizes of the
problem caches shrink. On an idle system he said he was seeing
about 16MB/min getting free or something like that. Something
that would take hours and hours before things freed up.
I asked and my friend told me that according to slabtop the slab
with the most memory used kept changing dramatically and he could
not see a pattern.
So at least on one old kernel on one strange workload there was a problem.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists