[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100916172732.ce21cd1b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 17:27:32 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip
tree related)
Hi Yinghai,
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:20:36 -0700 Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
I did not write this patch ...
> @@ -249,9 +249,8 @@ static void arm_memory_present(void)
> static void arm_memory_present(void)
> {
> struct memblock_region *reg;
> - int i;
>
> - for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
> + for_each_memblock(memory, reg)
> memory_present(0, memblock_region_base_pfn(reg),
> memblock_region_end_pfn(reg));
> }
That looks good (but I have not tested it). Thanks
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists