[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C921823.5080602@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:14:11 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] kvm: enable irq injection from interrupt context
On 09/16/2010 02:57 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > > > If you want to split parts that asserts irq and de-asserts it then we
> > > > should have irqfd that tracks line status and knows interrupt line
> > > > polarity.
> > >
> > > Yes, it can know about polarity even though I think it's cleaner to do this
> > > per gsi. But it can not track line status as line is shared with
> > > other devices.
> > It should track only device's line status.
>
> There is no such thing as device's line status on real hardware, either.
> Devices do not drive INT# high: they drive it low (all the time)
> or do not drive it at all.
>
That's just an implementation detail. Devices either assert INT# or
they do not. Tying the wires together constitutes an AND gate. This
gate has to be modelled somewhere, currently it's in qemu's pci emulation.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists