[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100916114743.5dcd228d@lilo>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:47:43 +0930
From: Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@....ibm.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Cross Memory Attach
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:07:11 -0400
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
>
> Interesting, and nice benchmark results. I have a question though:
>
> > + /* Get the pages we're interested in */
> > + pages_pinned = get_user_pages(task, task->mm, pa,
> > + nr_pages_to_copy,
> > + copy_to, 0, process_pages,
> > NULL); +
> > + if (pages_pinned != nr_pages_to_copy)
> > + goto end;
>
> ...
>
> > +end:
> > + for (i = 0; i < pages_pinned; i++) {
> > + if (copy_to)
> > + set_page_dirty_lock(process_pages[i]);
> > + put_page(process_pages[i]);
> > + }
>
> It looks to me like if get_user_pages() fails to pin *all* the pages,
> we treat the target pages as dirty even though we never actually
> touched them?
>
> Maybe it should be 'if (copy_to && *bytes_copied)'?
Yes that can happen, though the *bytes_copied check doesn't completely
fix it as copy_from_user could fail resulting in some pages being
touched, but not all of them. I'll add some code to only call
set_page_dirty_lock on pages that really have been touched...
Regards,
Chris
--
cyeoh@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists