[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10430.1284649951@localhost>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:12:31 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Subrata Modak <subrata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Linuxppc-dev <Linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
sachinp <sachinp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
DIVYA PRAKASH <dipraksh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35-stable/ppc64/p7: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage detected during 2.6.35-stable boot
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 09:12:00 PDT, "Paul E. McKenney" said:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 02:22:12PM +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage is detected
> > during 2.6.35-stable boot on my ppc64/p7 machine:
> >
> > =========================
> > [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > kernel/sched.c:616 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
> > other info that might help us debug this:
> Thank you for locating this one! This looks like the same issue that
> Ilia Mirkin located. Please see below for my analysis -- no fix yet,
> as I need confirmation from cgroups experts. I can easily create a
> patch that suppresses the warning, but I don't yet know whether this is
> the right thing to do.
Ping? I just hit it on 2.6.36-rc4-mmotm0915. Just wanted to make sure the
issue hadn't been lost/forgotten.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists