linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: hpet: Avoid the readback penalty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:04:50 +0100
From:	Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Neil Brown <nfbrown@...ell.com>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: hpet: Avoid the readback penalty

On 15 Sep 2010, Thomas Gleixner said:

> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> x86: hpet: Work around hardware stupidity
>
> After my brain recovered from yesterdays exposure with the x86 timer
> horror, I came up with a different solution for this problem, which
> avoids the readback of the compare register completely. It works
> nicely on my affected ATI system, but needs some exposure to the other
> machines.
>
> Comments ?

Works for me. (I still have boot problems, but these seem to be
NFS-related: -ESTALE from an apparently random subset of my mount points
at initial mount time. Restarting rpc.mountd on the server fixes
it. This is with nfs-utils 1.2.2, but I see it right up to 60abb98, that
being the most recent version I tested. This doesn't happen if the
client is running 2.6.34.x, as far as I can tell. It also doesn't happen
with all my 2.6.35.x clients. Sigh. I hate bugs like this.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/