linux-kernel - linux-next: build failure after merge of the irqflags tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100916145243.6656cfba.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:52:43 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the irqflags tree

Hi David,

After merging the irqflags tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:

arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c: In function 'xen_spin_lock_slow':
arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c:227: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_local_save_flags'

Caused by bd7712423fe88b35e4e107a820589406db26a72a ("Fix IRQ flag
handling naming").

I am impressed ... 3 Signed-off-by's, 1 Tested-by, 13 Acked-by's, 2
Reviewed-by's and still an x86_64 allmodconfig build fails.  :-)
[Sorry, I couldn't resist and, yes, I do realise that this patch covers
many architectures and that this statistic is irrelevant]

I have dropped the irqflags tree for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped