[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100916063616.GG2463@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:36:16 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dipankar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU: New scalable, multi-GP and preemptible RCU
implementation
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 05:43:12PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 09/14/2010 07:17 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Only in x86(32bit and 64bit) system.
> >>>> Did you patch it in power and test it? It' need more test for different archs,
> >>>> but I have no other arch.
> >>>>
> >>>> What is "hardware configuration"?
> >>>
> >>> Mainly the number of CPUs. The socket/core/thread counts could also
> >>> be helpful.
> >
> > Any info? ;-)
> >
>
> Ouch, answer this first:
> hardware1: x86, 1cpu X 2cores
> hardware2: x86_64, 2cpu X 2cores
> 48 hours rcutorture for each machine, (NO_HZ, cpu_plugin concurrently ... )
> ~120 minutes rcutorture for each different CONFIG.
>
> this work is my own work, not my company's, I can't access to
> big machines.
Thank you for the info!
I will do some testing some time in the next few weeks. Initial smoke
tests look promising.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists