[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100916063922.GA17596@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:39:22 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip
tree related)
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:29:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > assabet_defconfig and serveral other arm configs) failed like this:
> >
> > arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'arm_memory_present':
> > arch/arm/mm/init.c:260: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
> > arch/arm/mm/init.c:338: error: invalid storage class for function 'free_area'
> > arch/arm/mm/init.c:357: error: invalid storage class for function 'free_memmap'
> > arch/arm/mm/init.c:386: error: invalid storage class for function 'free_unused_memmap'
> > arch/arm/mm/init.c:601: error: invalid storage class for function 'keepinitrd_setup'
> > arch/arm/mm/init.c:606: error: initializer element is not constant
> > arch/arm/mm/init.c:606: error: (near initialization for '__setup_keepinitrd_setup.setup_func')
> > arch/arm/mm/init.c:606: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input
> > arch/arm/mm/init.c:252: warning: unused variable 'i'
> >
> > Caused by commit 719c1514f2fef5f01fcfa2bba81b7bb079c7c6a1 ("memblock/arm:
> > Use new accessors") which forgot a closing brace on a new
> > for_each_memblock() in arm_memory_present().
>
> So this commit is back in tip and the error is back in the builds ...
The ARM defconfig build doesnt fail here:
WARNING: modpost: Found 5 section mismatch(es).
To see full details build your kernel with:
'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y'
Is there some integration artifact here perhaps? If yes then linux-next
needs to resolve the integration artifact. If not then benh, Yinghai,
hpa, please have a look ...
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists