[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1284686949.7280.99.camel@schen9-DESK>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:29:09 -0700
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
James Smart <james.smart@...lex.com>,
Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@...gic.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@...co.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Drop host_lock around LLD SHT->queuecommand()
caller
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 15:35 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
>
> Greetings all,
>
> This series contains the first round of a whole-sale conversion for droping
> struct Scsi_Host->host_lock around struct Scsi_Host->queuecommand() within
> scsi_dispatch_cmd(). So with this first patch the only part of scsi_dispatch_cmd()
> that is protected by host_lock is scsi_cmd_get_serial)_.
>
Maybe we can change the host->cmd_serial_number to atomic and totally
avoid the need to take host_lock.
Tim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists