linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] ia64: possible module unwind table optimisation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTinm6qSOGTzX1J-3R27o5KxGkx8Esg+iCbb3Wnu6@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:44:38 -0700
From:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
To:	Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com>
Cc:	"fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ia64: possible module unwind table optimisation

> This is a shame, but not a real problem in the context of my patch - you can't
> usefully optimise something that's seemingly almost never used. It can be filed
> in the cylindrical filing cabinet.

I'll probably apply it anyway ... it looks like it will be useful when
I get things like this
working.  The initial problem with kmemleak seems to be configuration related. I
cut back from 4096 cpus on 1024 nodes to a more modest 32 cpus on 8 nodes,
and my system boots.  Still can't test your patch because although debugfs got
configured and apparently built-in ok ... I can't see it in
/proc/filesystems, so it
won't mount.

Thanks

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/