[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1284682396.32373.16.camel@yhuang-dev>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:13:16 +0800
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
"gorcunov@...il.com" <gorcunov@...il.com>,
"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Lin, Ming M" <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
"yinghai@...nel.org" <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"eranian@...gle.com" <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix duplicate calls of the nmi handler
On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 01:42 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 17:56 +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > The commit:
> >
> > e40b172 x86: Move notify_die from nmi.c to traps.c
> >
> > moved the nmi handler call to default_do_nmi(). DIE_NMI_IPI and
> > DIE_NMI are called subsequently now. If the return code is
> > !NOTIFY_STOP, then the handlers are called twice. This patch fixes
> > this.
>
> What is this NMI_IPI thing, and why do we bother?
>
> If the hardware reason thin can discriminate between IPI and other NMIs
> we should never call both chains, if it cannot, why do we have 2 chains?
>
> In any case, I don't think perf/oprofile/etc,. should use NMI_IPI, that
> doesn't really make sense.
>
> Or am I totally confused about things here?
Please take a look at my recent patch that rewrites the NMI handler.
Where NMI are divided into two types. CPU specific NMI are processed
firstly as DIE_NMI_IPI, and non-CPU specific NMI are processed as
DIE_NMI.
CPU specific NMIs include perf event, oprofile, crash, etc. They can be
processed on specific CPU only.
non-CPU specific NMIs include SERR and IOCHK NMI (via checking port
0x61) and APEI GHES NMI. They can be processed on any CPU.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists