| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1284698766.8721.32.camel@marge.simson.net> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:46:06 +0200 From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@...cle.com> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, John Wright <john.wright@...com> Subject: Re: 2.6.32.y stable kernel regression with taskset On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 12:35 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On 09/16/2010 07:42 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 05:45:12AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > >>> git bisect report: > >>> > >>> c6fc81afa2d7ef2f775e48672693d8a0a8a7325d is the first bad commit > >>> commit c6fc81afa2d7ef2f775e48672693d8a0a8a7325d > >>> Author: John Wright <john.wright@...com> > >>> Date: Tue Apr 13 16:55:37 2010 -0600 > >>> > >>> sched: Fix a race between ttwu() and migrate_task() > >> > >> Known issue. There's a sched series for 32-stable in the pipeline. > > > > Yes, sorry, I'm working my way through to them, hope to have them > > finished and applied soon. > > > > why not just revert that patch? Because it exists. If revert would fix the problem, neither the commit in question nor the upstream commit it mentions would exist. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists