[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100917063537.GA4534@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:05:37 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][-mm] memcg : memory cgroup cpu hotplug support update.
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> [2010-09-16 16:17:27]:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 15:22:04 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > This naming is from mem_cgroup_walk_tree(). Now we have
> >
> > mem_cgroup_walk_tree();
> > mem_cgroup_walk_all();
> >
> > Rename both ? But it should be in separated patch.
> >
>
> Considering a bit ...but..
>
> #define for_each_mem_cgroup(mem) \
> for (mem = mem_cgroup_get_first(); \
> mem; \
> mem = mem_cgroup_get_next(mem);) \
>
> seems to need some helper functions. I'll consider about this clean up
> but it requires some amount of patch because css_get()/css_put()/rcu...etc..
> are problematic.
>
Why does this need to be a macro (I know we use this for lists and
other places), assuming for now we don't use the iterator pattern, we
can rename mem_cgroup_walk_all() to for_each_mem_cgroup().
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists