linux-kernel - [117/129] drm/radeon/kms: force legacy pll algo for RV620 LVDS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100918191307.334784557@clark.site>
Date:	Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:13:35 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Subject: [117/129] drm/radeon/kms: force legacy pll algo for RV620 LVDS

2.6.35-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>

commit f90087eea44ce5fad139f086bc9d89ca37b0edc2 upstream.

There has been periodic evidence that LVDS, on at least some
panels, prefers the dividers selected by the legacy pll algo.
This patch forces the use of the legacy pll algo on RV620
LVDS panels.  The old behavior (new pll algo) can be selected
by setting the new_pll module parameter to 1.

Fixes:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30029

Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_crtc.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atombios_crtc.c
@@ -527,14 +527,15 @@ static u32 atombios_adjust_pll(struct dr
 					pll->algo = PLL_ALGO_LEGACY;
 					pll->flags |= RADEON_PLL_PREFER_CLOSEST_LOWER;
 				}
-				/* There is some evidence (often anecdotal) that RV515 LVDS
+				/* There is some evidence (often anecdotal) that RV515/RV620 LVDS
 				 * (on some boards at least) prefers the legacy algo.  I'm not
 				 * sure whether this should handled generically or on a
 				 * case-by-case quirk basis.  Both algos should work fine in the
 				 * majority of cases.
 				 */
 				if ((radeon_encoder->active_device & (ATOM_DEVICE_LCD_SUPPORT)) &&
-				    (rdev->family == CHIP_RV515)) {
+				    ((rdev->family == CHIP_RV515) ||
+				     (rdev->family == CHIP_RV620))) {
 					/* allow the user to overrride just in case */
 					if (radeon_new_pll == 1)
 						pll->algo = PLL_ALGO_NEW;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/