[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100918191302.666328887@clark.site>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:12:40 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@...il.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
Subject: [062/129] swap: prevent reuse during hibernation
2.6.35-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
commit b73d7fcecd93dc15eaa3c45c8c587b613f6673c4 upstream.
Move the hibernation check from scan_swap_map() into try_to_free_swap():
to catch not only the common case when hibernation's allocation itself
triggers swap reuse, but also the less likely case when concurrent page
reclaim (shrink_page_list) might happen to try_to_free_swap from a page.
Hibernation already clears __GFP_IO from the gfp_allowed_mask, to stop
reclaim from going to swap: check that to prevent swap reuse too.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>
Cc: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@...il.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
mm/swapfile.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -318,10 +318,8 @@ checks:
if (offset > si->highest_bit)
scan_base = offset = si->lowest_bit;
- /* reuse swap entry of cache-only swap if not hibernation. */
- if (vm_swap_full()
- && usage == SWAP_HAS_CACHE
- && si->swap_map[offset] == SWAP_HAS_CACHE) {
+ /* reuse swap entry of cache-only swap if not busy. */
+ if (vm_swap_full() && si->swap_map[offset] == SWAP_HAS_CACHE) {
int swap_was_freed;
spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
swap_was_freed = __try_to_reclaim_swap(si, offset);
@@ -688,6 +686,24 @@ int try_to_free_swap(struct page *page)
if (page_swapcount(page))
return 0;
+ /*
+ * Once hibernation has begun to create its image of memory,
+ * there's a danger that one of the calls to try_to_free_swap()
+ * - most probably a call from __try_to_reclaim_swap() while
+ * hibernation is allocating its own swap pages for the image,
+ * but conceivably even a call from memory reclaim - will free
+ * the swap from a page which has already been recorded in the
+ * image as a clean swapcache page, and then reuse its swap for
+ * another page of the image. On waking from hibernation, the
+ * original page might be freed under memory pressure, then
+ * later read back in from swap, now with the wrong data.
+ *
+ * Hibernation clears bits from gfp_allowed_mask to prevent
+ * memory reclaim from writing to disk, so check that here.
+ */
+ if (!(gfp_allowed_mask & __GFP_IO))
+ return 0;
+
delete_from_swap_cache(page);
SetPageDirty(page);
return 1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists