lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100918191300.356045910@clark.site>
Date:	Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:12:14 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com>
Subject: [036/129] ocfs2: Fix incorrect checksum validation error

2.6.35-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com>

commit f5ce5a08a40f2086435858ddc80cb40394b082eb upstream.

For local mounts, ocfs2_read_locked_inode() calls ocfs2_read_blocks_sync() to
read the inode off the disk. The latter first checks to see if that block is
cached in the journal, and, if so, returns that block. That is ok.

But ocfs2_read_locked_inode() goes wrong when it tries to validate the checksum
of such blocks. Blocks that are cached in the journal may not have had their
checksum computed as yet. We should not validate the checksums of such blocks.

Fixes ossbz#1282
http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1282

Signed-off-by: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@...cle.com>
Singed-off-by: Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 fs/ocfs2/inode.c |    6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
@@ -488,7 +488,11 @@ static int ocfs2_read_locked_inode(struc
 						     OCFS2_BH_IGNORE_CACHE);
 	} else {
 		status = ocfs2_read_blocks_sync(osb, args->fi_blkno, 1, &bh);
-		if (!status)
+		/*
+		 * If buffer is in jbd, then its checksum may not have been
+		 * computed as yet.
+		 */
+		if (!status && !buffer_jbd(bh))
 			status = ocfs2_validate_inode_block(osb->sb, bh);
 	}
 	if (status < 0) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ