lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:11:55 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: [017/129] PCI: MSI: Remove unsafe and unnecessary hardware access

2.6.35-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>

commit fcd097f31a6ee207cc0c3da9cccd2a86d4334785 upstream.

During suspend on an SMP system, {read,write}_msi_msg_desc() may be
called to mask and unmask interrupts on a device that is already in a
reduced power state.  At this point memory-mapped registers including
MSI-X tables are not accessible, and config space may not be fully
functional either.

While a device is in a reduced power state its interrupts are
effectively masked and its MSI(-X) state will be restored when it is
brought back to D0.  Therefore these functions can simply read and
write msi_desc::msg for devices not in D0.

Further, read_msi_msg_desc() should only ever be used to update a
previously written message, so it can always read msi_desc::msg
and never needs to touch the hardware.

Tested-by: "Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 drivers/pci/msi.c |   36 ++++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -196,30 +196,15 @@ void unmask_msi_irq(unsigned int irq)
 void read_msi_msg_desc(struct irq_desc *desc, struct msi_msg *msg)
 {
 	struct msi_desc *entry = get_irq_desc_msi(desc);
-	if (entry->msi_attrib.is_msix) {
-		void __iomem *base = entry->mask_base +
-			entry->msi_attrib.entry_nr * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE;
 
-		msg->address_lo = readl(base + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_LOWER_ADDR);
-		msg->address_hi = readl(base + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_UPPER_ADDR);
-		msg->data = readl(base + PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_DATA);
-	} else {
-		struct pci_dev *dev = entry->dev;
-		int pos = entry->msi_attrib.pos;
-		u16 data;
-
-		pci_read_config_dword(dev, msi_lower_address_reg(pos),
-					&msg->address_lo);
-		if (entry->msi_attrib.is_64) {
-			pci_read_config_dword(dev, msi_upper_address_reg(pos),
-						&msg->address_hi);
-			pci_read_config_word(dev, msi_data_reg(pos, 1), &data);
-		} else {
-			msg->address_hi = 0;
-			pci_read_config_word(dev, msi_data_reg(pos, 0), &data);
-		}
-		msg->data = data;
-	}
+	/* We do not touch the hardware (which may not even be
+	 * accessible at the moment) but return the last message
+	 * written.  Assert that this is valid, assuming that
+	 * valid messages are not all-zeroes. */
+	BUG_ON(!(entry->msg.address_hi | entry->msg.address_lo |
+		 entry->msg.data));
+
+	*msg = entry->msg;
 }
 
 void read_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, struct msi_msg *msg)
@@ -232,7 +217,10 @@ void read_msi_msg(unsigned int irq, stru
 void write_msi_msg_desc(struct irq_desc *desc, struct msi_msg *msg)
 {
 	struct msi_desc *entry = get_irq_desc_msi(desc);
-	if (entry->msi_attrib.is_msix) {
+
+	if (entry->dev->current_state != PCI_D0) {
+		/* Don't touch the hardware now */
+	} else if (entry->msi_attrib.is_msix) {
 		void __iomem *base;
 		base = entry->mask_base +
 			entry->msi_attrib.entry_nr * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ