linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kvm: fix irqfd assign/deassign race

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4C9634230200005A00072005@soto.provo.novell.com>
Date:	Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:02:43 -0600
From:	"Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To:	"Tejun Heo" <tj@...nel.org>, "Avi Kivity" <avi@...hat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@...hat.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: fix irqfd assign/deassign race

>>> On 9/19/2010 at 01:02 PM, in message <20100919170231.GA12620@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote: 
> I think I see the following (theoretical) race:
> 
> During irqfd assign, we drop irqfds lock before we
> schedule inject work. Therefore, deassign running
> on another CPU could cause shutdown and flush to run
> before inject, causing user after free in inject.
> 
> A simple fix it to schedule inject under the lock.

I swear there was some reason why the schedule_work() was done outside of the lock, but I can't for the life of me remember why anymore (it obviously was a failing on my part to _comment_ why if there was such a reason).  So, short of recalling what that reason was, and the fact that Michael's theory seems rational and legit... 

Acked-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>

> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> ---
> 
> If the issue is real, this might be a 2.6.36 and -stable
> candidate. Comments?
> 
>  virt/kvm/eventfd.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> index 66cf65b..c1f1e3c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> @@ -218,7 +218,6 @@ kvm_irqfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi)
>  	events = file->f_op->poll(file, &irqfd->pt);
>  
>  	list_add_tail(&irqfd->list, &kvm->irqfds.items);
> -	spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Check if there was an event already pending on the eventfd
> @@ -227,6 +226,8 @@ kvm_irqfd_assign(struct kvm *kvm, int fd, int gsi)
>  	if (events & POLLIN)
>  		schedule_work(&irqfd->inject);
>  
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&kvm->irqfds.lock);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * do not drop the file until the irqfd is fully initialized, otherwise
>  	 * we might race against the POLLHUP




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/