linux-kernel - Re: [Stable-review] [064/123] sched: Protect task->cpus_allowed access in sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1284873006.7467.1.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date:	Sun, 19 Sep 2010 07:10:06 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, stable-review@...nel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Stable-review] [064/123] sched: Protect task->cpus_allowed
 access in sched_getaffinity()

On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 21:32 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I'm somewhat disturbed by the number of non-trivial scheduler changes
> here.  How well have these been tested as applied to the 2.6.32.y
> branch?

All of them of course.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/