[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100919112323.GE7350@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:23:23 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] kvm: enable irq injection from interrupt context
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:05:09PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/19/2010 12:55 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:56:12PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 09/19/2010 12:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> >On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 09:59:29AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> >> > writing 0 to eventfd does nothing. The way to deassert irq
> >> >> That is implementation detail of current irqfd. It was designed for MSI
> >> >> not level triggered interrupts.
> >> >
> >> >Maybe we should add a check that gsi is mapped to MSI (or unmapped) then?
> >> >Level which switches to 1 and back to 0 immediately will be racy anyway
> >> >...
> >> >
> >>
> >> Add a check where?
> >
> >I would make sure that if you bind irqfd to a non-MSI GSI,
> >signalling it has no effect.
> >
>
> Certainly. We should also update the documentation, when we have
> irqfd documentation.
When and if we start supporing level, we'll have to add a capability flag.
By way of documentation, reserve a bit value in header right now?
> --
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists