[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100920141314.11066.19947.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:13:14 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] frv: avoid infinite loop of SIGSEGV delivery
From: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Use force_sigsegv() rather than force_sig(SIGSEGV, ...) as the former resets
the SEGV handler pointer which will kill the process, rather than leaving it
open to an infinite loop if the SEGV handler itself caused a SEGV signal.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
arch/frv/kernel/signal.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/frv/kernel/signal.c b/arch/frv/kernel/signal.c
index 5fb2d06..48203c6 100644
--- a/arch/frv/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/frv/kernel/signal.c
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static int setup_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, sigset_t *set)
return 0;
give_sigsegv:
- force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
+ force_sigsegv(sig, current);
return -EFAULT;
} /* end setup_frame() */
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
return 0;
give_sigsegv:
- force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
+ force_sigsegv(sig, current);
return -EFAULT;
} /* end setup_rt_frame() */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists